Including an AI generated image in a post advocating for AI in education really hurts the point you’re trying to make.
It’s ironic that this is written in response that says “progressivism is prone to fads”, and you advocate for AI in education. We could look back at this and say it’s another fad. I think it’s easy to envision AI becoming…
Including an AI generated image in a post advocating for AI in education really hurts the point you’re trying to make.
It’s ironic that this is written in response that says “progressivism is prone to fads”, and you advocate for AI in education. We could look back at this and say it’s another fad. I think it’s easy to envision AI becoming less accessible and more costly, as the GenAI companies are currently burning through cash at historic rates and generating very little revenue.
I want to see education using research-validated practices that are scalable. Right now, AI is in its relative infancy and we have limited data to support widespread adoption of the technology. I don’t think teachers are the most technically savvy population. Is the capital required to train teachers in effective AI practices worth it? We don’t know. But we can look at what’s happening in Mississippi with improved reading achievement, and how the system is achieving that, and feel confident that is a better direction to take. The practices educators are using are research validated and they’re being trained appropriately to leverage those practices.
Including an AI generated image in a post advocating for AI in education really hurts the point you’re trying to make.
It’s ironic that this is written in response that says “progressivism is prone to fads”, and you advocate for AI in education. We could look back at this and say it’s another fad. I think it’s easy to envision AI becoming less accessible and more costly, as the GenAI companies are currently burning through cash at historic rates and generating very little revenue.
I want to see education using research-validated practices that are scalable. Right now, AI is in its relative infancy and we have limited data to support widespread adoption of the technology. I don’t think teachers are the most technically savvy population. Is the capital required to train teachers in effective AI practices worth it? We don’t know. But we can look at what’s happening in Mississippi with improved reading achievement, and how the system is achieving that, and feel confident that is a better direction to take. The practices educators are using are research validated and they’re being trained appropriately to leverage those practices.